Education

Revision Rhinoplasty After Implant, Gore-Tex, Silicone, or Graft Failure

Revision rhinoplasty after a nasal implant or graft problem — why silicone, Gore-Tex, or Medpor can fail, how the nose is evaluated, and how support is reconstructed.

ABFPRS

Facial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery

ABOto

Otolaryngology — Head & Neck Surgery

AAFPRS

Fellowship Director

Overview

Nasal implants and grafts can sometimes become infected, visible, displaced, or poorly integrated. When that happens, revision focuses on identifying exactly what is present and rebuilding safe, durable support — often with the patient's own cartilage.

Medically reviewed by Moustafa Mourad, MD, FACS — dual board-certified Facial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgeon and Otolaryngologist (Head & Neck Surgery).

Last reviewed: June 2026

Key takeaways

  • Implants and grafts can become infected, visible, displaced, resorbed, or extruded.
  • Silicone, Gore-Tex, Medpor, and various cartilage grafts each behave differently.
  • Evaluation may use operative reports, old photos, exam, endoscopy, and sometimes imaging.
  • If a prior implant no longer provides safe support, reconstruction may use autologous cartilage.
  • These cases can be complex, and staged planning is sometimes needed.

An Established Academic Authority

Double board certification. Fellowship director. Published author. A surgeon's surgeon.

ABFPRS

Board Certified

American Board of Facial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery

ABOto

Board Certified

American Board of Otolaryngology — Head & Neck Surgery

AAFPRS

Fellowship Director

American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Textbook

Published Author

Contributions to the academic literature of facial plastic surgery

Dual board certification in both Facial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery and Otolaryngology — Head & Neck Surgery.

Castle Connolly Top Doctor — Plastic Surgery, 2026
01

Why implants or grafts sometimes fail

Prior nasal implants or grafts may become infected, visible, displaced, resorbed, extruded, or poorly integrated. Some patients develop skin thinning, contour irregularity, collapse, or persistent breathing obstruction. When any of these occur, revision is directed at understanding the cause before deciding what to do.

02

Common materials and how they differ

The materials involved behave differently, which shapes the plan:

  • Silicone and Gore-Tex — synthetic implants that can sometimes displace, become infected, or extrude
  • Medpor — a porous synthetic implant that integrates with tissue and can be more involved to remove
  • Cadaveric and septal, ear, or rib cartilage — biologic grafts that vary in resorption and warping behavior

For a comparison of biologic graft options used in reconstruction, see cadaver rib vs autologous rib rhinoplasty.

03

Evaluation

Evaluation may require prior operative reports, old photographs, a thorough examination, nasal endoscopy, and sometimes imaging. The surgeon must identify what material is present, and its condition, before deciding whether to remove, replace, or support it.

04

Reconstruction

If a prior implant or graft no longer provides safe support, reconstruction may require autologous cartilage — often rib cartilage in major cases — to rebuild a stable framework. Functional concerns such as nasal valve collapse are addressed at the same time when present.

05

Counseling and realistic goals

Revision after an implant or graft complication can be complex. Goals should be realistic, and staged planning may be needed when tissue is thin, scarred, or infected. The revision rhinoplasty page covers the overall approach, and you can schedule a consultation to have your specific situation evaluated.

Frequently Asked

Revision Rhinoplasty After Implant, Gore-Tex, Silicone, or Graft Failure — patient questions, honestly answered.

Synthetic implants can displace, become infected, extrude, or cause skin thinning and contour irregularity over time. When this happens, patients may notice visibility, asymmetry, or breathing problems. Revision addresses what is present and rebuilds safe support.

Not always, and it is decided after evaluation. The surgeon first identifies what material is present and its condition using operative reports, examination, endoscopy, and sometimes imaging, then decides whether to remove, replace, or support it based on whether it is providing safe, stable support.

When a prior implant or graft no longer provides safe support, reconstruction often uses the patient's own cartilage — septal, ear, or, in major cases, rib cartilage — to rebuild a stable framework. The choice depends on how much support is needed.

Sometimes. When tissue is thin, scarred, or infected, staged planning may be safer than attempting everything at once. Whether a staged approach is needed is determined during evaluation and discussed with you in advance.

Next step

Plans are individualized. The consultation is where that begins.

Reach the Manhattan office to schedule a private consultation with Dr. Mourad.

Educational content only — not medical advice. Individual results vary. No outcome is guaranteed.Source reference